A Samurai in Time

 Japanese Film Festival 2025

Cinema 1, The Red Carpet

Edsa Shangri-la Mall

As the title suggests, "A Samurai in Time" is a time travel film about a real life Edo period samurai Kosaka Shinzaemon who by some freak in nature through a lightning strike is transported 400 years into the future. He conveniently 'lands' on a film set of a Kyoto television series where he is mistaken as an extra. Trouble brews as he yields an actual katana sword and almost ends up killing the main character. Sticking to the code of honor of a samurai, he defends the 'damsel in distress' character of the series.

Kosaka is mostly confined on the set of the film where the kind hearted AD (assistant director) takes him to a hospital because he hurt his head during one of the reel sword fights on the set. Assuming that he got amnesia from the injury, the AD also helps him settle in a nearby temple where the shooting is done. 

Kosaka settles down quickly earning his living as an extra on the film set. It is only when he is cast in another Jidaigeki genre film where the twist occurs. This genre refers to Japanese period dramas set primarily in the Edo period, known for its authentic portrayal and historical accuracy in costumes and styling. Normally these films, TV series or theatrical plays feature samurai, sword fighting and tales of honor highlighting the struggle between good and evil. A popular film genre which is slowly losing its appeal to the younger generation.

So back to the twist, I won't reveal any spoilers but suffice to say, it added a much needed boost to the storyline of this film within a film heartwarming light comedy with an equal amount of dramatic sequences (especially the sword fighting scenes) and emotionally reflective moments.  

Showtime 7

 Japanese Film Festival 2025

Cinema 1, The Red Carpet

Edsa Shangri la Mall

So after that really confusing, ambiguous existential tale about either evil exist or does not exist, in terms of  mankind encroaching upon nature's ecosystem, I wanted a lighter much lighter, easy to understand Japanese film.

Showtime 7 served its purpose in being a straight forward drama without frills except for yet another open ended conclusion. Is it now the norm for Japanese movies (or European movies too) to end without issues being resolved in plain black and white? I really don't know.

Basically it is a drama/mystery film about a former radio celebrity who was relegated to another radio show because he got involved in some controversy. He spends his days at his show giving out trivia and connecting with his loyal followers. Until one day, a caller issues a bomb threat at one of his programs. At first, it was not taken seriously until an actual bombing takes place at some power plant.

Next thing we know and see is the former radio celebrity is back in his elements. That is being investigative, knows all the right questions to ask the so called 'bomber' who has labor and employment issues. Celebrity radio show is now at the thick of it, even getting a bigger studio and a wider audience who are all fascinated with the clues that the 'bomber' gives as well as a race against time as his threats get more specific and deadly.

Actually I got a bit bored mid way and lost all interest as to the true motive of the so called bomber because it exuded an amateurish case of whodunit and the 'threat' was not too plausible, either. The only redeeming value is the good performance of the cast and as I stated earlier, the intriguing open ended conclusion.  So yeah, I won't recommend this movie. Good thing, admission was free!

Evil does not Exist

Japanese Film Festival 2025

Cinema 1, The Red Carpet

Edsa Shangri-la Mall 

The first four minutes (yes I timed it lol) of this nature infused movie has no dialogue, just a footage of tall trees, and the clear sky. It looks like it is viewed from the perspective of someone lying down who is being transported through a forested area. Whether this sequence is related in any way to the shocking conclusion is debatable. In the same manner, that the title itself and the ending of the film is open to various interpretations, all of which are valid depending on your level of comprehension. But I am getting ahead of myself.

Pristine images of a small rural town provide an excellent backdrop to the story of a father and daughter whose lives will soon be taken over by a company that threatens to disturb their calm surroundings. Takumi, a taciturn jack of all trades spends his days collecting pure mountain water for a local eatery, picking wild wasabi, chopping wood for his fireplace, picking his daughter Hana up from school (although more often than not, he loses track of time so the girl makes her own way home through the forest trail) and spends time with friends which is typical in a small town where everyone basically knows each other.

The quiet town, about two hours away from Tokyo (or so they say) is about to be invaded by corporate Japan. A start up company plans to put up a glamping area for local tourists to chill and relax from the hustle and bustle of city life. Naturally this doesn't go well with the community even as two representatives are sent to the town to basically pitch their brilliant idea even though their plans are all drawn up and it is merely a formality to inform the town of the major project.

In an open forum at the town hall meeting, it is clear that the company has nil knowledge about nature and how the glamping site would severely affect the natural flow of the environment. The town is also the habitat of wild sika deers which play an integral part in this intriguing film's climax. 

No, I won't reveal any spoilers. But yes, this slow burn movie about nature reacting to human interference and the disturbance of the ecosystem has a sinister twist towards the ending.  It would leave you with more questions than answers. The beautiful part is that it lingers even after you have stepped out of the movie theater. 

The director said in a lengthy interview that he specifically ended it that way so the audience can form their own opinions about what they just witnessed in the film. I guess he is correct because until now I find myself still wracking my brain cells with a million and one deductions incessantly.

L' amour et Les Forets (Just the Two of Us) France

 Cine Europa

Cinema 3, Red Carpet Cinema

Edsa Shangri-la Mall

The English translation of this French movie is "Love and Forests", not "Just the Two of Us". But I can see and understand why a forest is referenced in the title, it played an integral part in this dramatic movie about obsessively possessive behaviour disguised as love.

Blanche, a literature teacher meets Gregoire at a party she was hesitant to attend. They click instantly, as they laugh at the same jokes, discuss Moliere endlessly, and have sexual compatibility. Soon enough, they get married and have kids right away. It is only when Gregoire convinces her to move to another town away from her closely knitted family (her mother and her twin sister) that troubles arise. 

It turns out that Greg (let's call him that as it is too long to type his entire name lol) is a jealous, self absorbed, manipulative control freak and dare I say, for lack of a better term, a sociopath. He doesn't want Blanche to work, controls her finances, is in a good mood then gets all riled up over petty things. He also tends to play games like portraying himself as the victim when things heat up between them. His tearful apologies, his I.don't.know.why.I.am.this.way pleas, his 'mea culpa' stance - anything just so Blanche will have pity on him, and hope deep in her heart that he changes his ways . But it is just a ruse.

It is interesting to watch how a "supposedly" good person with all the right characteristics you would want in a life partner, suddenly turn into a totally different person. Maybe that was his true persona and he was just masking it? Was he born this way? Did some past trauma in his childhood or his adolescent years scar him? Did Blanche trigger this behavioral shift? Is he even aware that he is that way? It is difficult to decipher how these 'sociopaths' are wired.

The film is narrated from Blanche's point of view as she tells her domestic abuse story to her divorce laywer. She is a tough cookie but even the strongest among us can crumble under such an immensely intense and stressful life situation. Although it is understandable that any woman would want to get out of this situation by any means possible, sometimes it is NOT as easy as just packing up and leaving. In the same breath, what Blanche does to escape from her miserable marital woes, is in my books not justifiable, either. This is where the forest in the title comes in, but I am not giving away any spoilers. Suffice to say, you can't right a wrong by another wrong. I will simply leave it at that.

As most European movies go, this film ends with an open ended conclusion. As we see both parties enter the judge's office, we are left to form our own conclusions. Does Blanche gets her happy ending through a divorce or does Greg play his victim card to his advantage?  

Father and Mothers (Denmark)

 Cine Europa 2025

Cinema 3, Red Carpet Cinemas    

Edsa Shangri la Mall

This Danish film focuses on the length that parents will go to secure a good education for their children. Piv and her husband Ulrich surmise that their daughter Hannah is not developing properly in a public school setting. So when a  slot is available at an exclusive school in a close knit community, they grab the opportunity to enroll their somewhat shy and unenthusiastic daughter.  

Judging from the interview with the strict headmaster Adrian, this new school exudes an elitish, snobbish vibe. Yet Piv and Ulrich are determined that Hannah will finally thrive after years of transferring from one school to another school. 

They first get to meet the other parents in a meeting to discuss the annual camping trip. A whole bunch of characters who one might mistake to be part of some cult. You know those types who are active in sports, do yoga, eat healthy, self righteous and always politically correct kind of individuals. They are all seemingly friendly to each other yet also high competitive. Piv and Ulrich try to always be on their best behavior as they aim to please and ingratiate themselves with the other parents. They are further put 'on the spot' as they join the annual camping/cabin trip in some idyllic garden/forest resort. 

The film clearly focuses on merely the rapport and camaraderie between the parents during this camping trip. Their kids are mostly nameless and just shown in the backdrop. The kids are well behaved, interact with each other and all get along well. The same though cannot be said for their parents who get into each other's affairs, resorts to pointing out each other's flaws and a general sense of resentment, even envy permeates throughout their interaction at the camp. 

The characteristics and attitudes of the different characters are multi-dimensional and well acted out by the cast. This is what elevates this film from a mere PTA meeting/gathering one layered plot albeit sans the teachers. Personally I am not a parent but one does not have to be a parent to recognize the competitiveness, the hypocrisy and the false pretenses just to get their kids in good schools. It is mostly for social status if I may boldly say so because in the long run, it is the children who ultimately either suffer or benefit from the eccentric often weird shenanigans of their parents. That's quite sad.

Un Metier Serieux (A Real Job) France

 Cine Europa 2025

Cinema 3, Red Carpet Cinemas

Edsa Shangri-la Mall

Nothing much goes on in this comedy drama about a group of teachers in a middle school in a smal French town. Main character is Benjamin, a PhD student who is a substitute math teacher. Fresh graduate with no relevant teaching experience, he makes do with the help of the other supporting teachers. Nowadays, students are more vocal and quite aware of their rights so teaching isn't an easy job. 

Benjamin's parents (his father is a doctor while his mother is a professor) believes he will be better off finishing his doctoral studies first so he will have more fruitful opportunities. But as the title suggests, Benjamin is determined to prove that being a teacher is a real job. And a thankless job at that. But mercifully, Benjamin's co teachers make him feel welcome and help him adjust to this teaching duties.

Personally, I know it is very difficult to balance your job and your doctoral studies. Both tasks require a lot of time and effort, not to mention tons of research to finish. It can really lead to one not finishing one's Phd degree because work (especially teaching) takes up most of your entire waking hours. So in that aspect, Benjamin's dilemma is relatable to anyone who is in his shoes. 

Good ensemble cast composed of credible actors who all give their characters depth and personality in an otherwise predictable narrative set in a small French town middle school. No major dramatic conflict to throw the characters off key, just a very minor character arc for the lead star, no open ended conclusion to wreck  your brain cells. Everything simply falls into its proper place, a nice way to spend a lazy September Saturday afternoon.

Beyond the Blue Border (Germany)

 Cine Europa 2025

Cinema 3, Red Carpet Cinemas

Edsa Shangri-la Mall

Beyond the blue border in this case refers to the Baltic sea which separates a small East German town from the nearest island town of Fehmarn located in West Germany. Set in the late 1980s when Germany was still divided by the Berlin wall, (the East was ruled by Communist rule while the West had a democratic form of government) we encounter best friends Hanna and Andreas. They have been friends since childhood and even live in the same government type housing complex.  

Hanna is an excellent swimmer. In fact, she is part of the national swimming team. She is in training to compete in a big championship and dreams of being an Olympian. Andreas, on the other hand is a delinquent non conformist who is often sent to rehab. But you need to understand that under Communist rule, rehab is a harsh, labor intensive method of  'correcting' bad behavoir. Totally not reformative, in any way.

A desperate Andreas comes up with a plan to 'escape' from the rigors of living under Communist rule. He wants to swim towards freedom. 30 - 40 kilometers is the distance they need to swim towards the nearest West German town. Although Hanna is not really repressed and has a chance of being a champion swimmer, she decides to join her best friend. She even helps in training him like teaching him how to hold his breath under water, and how to adapt the correct swimming posture.

Filmed in a non linear structure, we are shown scenes of the friends in their daily school lives, their interaction with their peers and their parents. Along with sequences of them swimming in frigid sea waters under calm and stormy conditions, trying not to get caught or killed by the authorities. With only a thin cord connected around their wrists keeping them close to each other. They survive by eating chocolates nicely packed in a plastic bag during lulls from their swimming quest.

It is doubly disturbing how seemingly 'normal' students/friends feel that their only way to survive in a such a harsh world is to escape by swimming across the Baltic sea. Because aside from the narratives of Andreas being harassed in rehab, there isn't a very compelling reason for them to leave everything behind. In fact, Hanna is very closed to her mostly home bound father who is suffering from some mental disability which isn't mentioned in the film. On account of the closeness between father and daughter, I couldn't understand how she could just leave him behind. But I reckon her friendship with Andreas took precedence because she was willing to give up her dream of being an Olympian swimmer just to help her best friend Andreas have a chance at a better life.

A gripping tale of friendship depicting the dreams of young people who have nothing to lose and everything to gain even if it means putting their lives in danger. Beyong the Blue Border gives us a good perspective to never take freedom for granted. 

The Peasants (Poland)

 Cine Europa 2025

Cinema 3, the Red Carpet Cinemas

Shangri-la Mall

Today was the launch of the 28th Cine Europa film festival for this year. The opening film is an artistic showcase from Poland, the country where Blessed Pope John Paul II was born. This is the first time I witnessed an film styled like a mural/painting or is it the other way around? A painting that was converted into a film? Suffice to say, it was very realistically made and quite an interesting concept. 

It is the film adaptation of a 1924 Nobel prize winning novel by Wladyslaw Reymont. It is a huge feat for the filmmakers to condense into roughly two hours all the four volume novels about life in a small Polish agricultural town. A society/community where intrigues, gossip mongering, deceit, prevail in a patriarchal society with a strong feminine presence, on a daily basis. I also read that it took over 100 painters to recreate each of the live action frames for the scenes. It was so realistic that after a while, you don't notice it is a painted animation film.

The film focuses on Jagna, a beautiful free spirited 19 year old lass who tends to be both naive as well as, for lack of a better word, a sly character. The kind of person who knows she is pretty but at the same time exudes a certain innocence that men tend to fall for. Now, this isn't necessarily a bad thing but neither is it a good trait for a young lady.  And in the lush country side of the small Polish town, she is the center of attraction. She is of marrying age, so men of all shapes and sizes are all falling over themselves to win her. Of course in a town steeped in traditions, the one with the most wealth would be the appropriate choice as her husband.

The vivid tapestry of the changing seasons from the hot summer days, the changing color of the leaves during autumn to the freezing snowy winter nights provide a very rich background to the story of Jagna. Mostly the scenes unfold with frantic and intense tones, interspersed with laid back dragging sequences where nothing happens. Peaking towards a very fervent conclusion with "the Scarlet Letter" connotation. Suffice to say if you haven't read or heard of "the Scarlet Letter" novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, you would certainly not get my drift nor understand what I am alluding to, at all.

Don't be fooled with the stunning visuals, the animated painting frames because The Peasants to all intents and purposes is quite a heavy laden motion picture. It deals with social ills, community based envy, small town intrigues and deceit, all unfolding in a period fraught with traditional behaviors, spiritual customs, and even certain controversial aspects of religiosity.  It is quite interesting but it might not appeal to the sensitivities of everybody.