Tuesday, February 16, 2010

VALENTINE'S DAY

Ashton Kutcher, Jessica Alba, Jessica Biel, Bradley Cooper, Patrick Dempsey, Julia Roberts, Jaime Foxx, Hector Elizondo, Jennifer Garner, Topher Grace, Shirley Maclaine, Emma Roberts, Anne Hathaway, Taylor Swift, Queen Latifah, Taylor Lutner, Eric Dane

"A Love Story. More or Less"

Cinema 1, Shang Cineplex

This star studded romantic comedy unfolds on Valentine's Day. It is a smorgasbord of love stories whose characters intertwine with each other. It deals with the pressures of celebrating one day where it is almost a sin to be single and alone. It also follows the lives of several couples and their way of dealing with a highly commercialized 'holiday'. Heartbreaks, breakups as well as happy endings are the normal topics for romantic comedies. More so for a film whose title alone denotes a day associated with hearts and all the various aspects of Love! It is a film that caters to every age, shape and sizes. From lovestruck teenagers, lonely single ladies, newly dating couples to a pair who have been married for decades.

A flower shop pretty much serves as the hub for much of the action in the film. Characters pop in and out to order bouquets for their loved ones and as well as for their extras (aka mistresses). Dialogue is light, sometimes funny which deserve a chuckle or two. Other times it is silly and mushy as Reed, (Ashton Kutcher) a florist dispenses pieces of love advice. But the best part are the end-credit outtakes where they show scenes of the actors fumbling their lines which proves they are just human and can make mistakes while taping.

But the film has good entertainment value with hardly any major conflicts for dramatic effect. Each story would have been more interesting if there was more in depth development of its characters. It is light and breezy just like the feeling of discovering something new about someone you just started dating. But it doesn't really make such of an impact as far as date movies and chick lit flicks go. There is major eye candy galore though as you have hunks like Bradley Cooper, Patrick Dempsey and Eric Dane playing significant roles.

In conclusion, I still believe that "Love Actually" did a much better job in depicting what L.O.V.E encompasses albeit it was set during the hectic Yuletide season.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

2012

John Cusack, Woody Harrelson, Thandie Newton, Amanda Peet,
Chiwetel Ejiofor, Oliver Platt, Danny Glover

"We were warned"


This disaster movie with an ensemble cast does well in the special effects department. There are plenty graphic scenes of volcanic eruptions, tsunamis and major earthquakes wreaking havoc all over the world. According to a team of geophysical scientists, the main cause - the sun's radiation is overheating the earth's core/crust. Naturally, the rich countries through their leaders pull their resources together to develop giant 'arks' which surprisingly can survive this impending cataclysm. Of course, the main characters somehow through some miracle make their way to the arks after going through really sticky situations which no one in his right mind would ever survive. But they make it just in time before the whole world tumbles and self destructs.

I don't know what it is about disaster movies but even good actors turn into amateurs as they utter corny and silly dialogue. People pining for each other, saying their farewell amidst such destruction. Throughout the film, I kept trying to figure out who among the cast will survive, who won't make it, how and when they will die. It was suspenseful in the sense that the element of time slowly running out for some of the characters.

Just like any other disaster themed films which don't offer any lessons to the audience, it was entertaining in a mindless form of way. I had set my mood not to expect too much from it anyhow except to be blown away by the well edited computer generated scenes!

Thursday, February 11, 2010

THE UGLY TRUTH

Katherine Heigel, Gerard Butler, Eric Winter, Cheryl Hines

Opposites attract is normally a good topic to showcase in romantic comedies. This film set in Sacramento presents Abby Richter (Katherine Heigel) who is a producer of a lackluster morning news show. She is a hopeless romantic with a checklist of the traits of her ideal man. To boost ratings, her boss hires Mike Chadway, (Gerard Butler) a local cable host of a program called "The ugly truth". On his program he preaches that men only want sex in a relationship, they only respond to positively attractive women and men can't and won't ever change! His prejudiced and sexist attitude is totally offensive so Abby despises him. But he makes a deal that if she listens to his pieces of advice on love and relationships, she will be able to snag her neighbor Colin (Eric Winter), a hot looking doctor who seems too good to be true. The rest of the film unfolds on two story lines: the main plot with Mike and Abby teaming up to snag Colin, and the subplot of Mike breathing new life into the morning show. His presence ultimately boosts the ratings of the show, much to Abby's chagrin.

This film understandably has a R rating since most of Mike's dating advice tend to border on the crass, raunchy type. The dialogue was sometimes funny and often times a bit offensive to women but delivered with great comedic timing from Gerard Butler. Butler's public image as a "bad boy" type suits his role. Perhaps next only to Colin Farrell who I think would have been a good substitute for the Mike Chadway character. I noticed the good flirtatious chemistry between the two main leads. Their rapport was palpable even though they do have contrasting personalities. Mike is crude, sexist and chauvinistic while Abby is endearing, refreshing and romantic.

This being a romantic comedy, it is practically a given that Abby and Mike end up together. So that was quite predictable. But it was done realistically where they first get on each others nerves before becoming love birds. So for that matter, the film succeeds in becoming an enjoyable rom-com!

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE MORGANS?

Sarah Jessica Parker, Hugh Grant, Mary Steenburgen, Sam Elliott

"We're not in Manhattan anymore."


Cinema 2, Shang Cineplex

The movie is angled towards how a separated couple react to their new but temporary surroundings (Wyoming) after they are abruptly transported out of their comfort zone (New York City) as part of the witness protection program.
Meryl (Sarah Jessica Parker) and Paul Morgan (Hugh Grant) must not only learn to adjust to their new environment which I'd have to say was pretty panoramic, they must also cope with each other as they slowly start to play the blame game. The game where they both enumerate the numerous flaws in their marriage and why it miserably failed. Well sad to say they got on my nerves!

The premise sounded pretty good on paper. Yet somehow this romantic comedy doesn't sit well in my list of rom coms to remember. There was hardly any chemistry between SJP and Hugh Grant. There were several boring scenes of SJP's pasty face ruminating about their failed marriage and her adoption plans while Hugh Grant tried to look remorseful about his past indiscretions. She looked really haggard without makeup and felt like a fish out of water in Wyoming. Debonair yet ever so charming Hugh Grant did have some funny dialogue to redeem his romantic lead part but after some time it was painfully pathetic to watch him try so hard. At first I figured since they are an estranged couple naturally there should be a certain degree of awkwardness between them. I assume it was their way of projecting their roles.

But after a while, I simply stopped caring about the Morgans, really! So what if they witnessed a murder? So what if there is a menacing bear on the loose just outside their 'hiding' place? So what if there is a supposedly dangerous hired killer on their trail? It simply didn't make much sense to torture the audience for 103 minutes with their inane shenanigans.

The only good thing about this movie is that it was filmed in such a scenic place with alot of rugged appeal. The mountains, the lake, the small town vibe provided a gorgeous backdrop to such a dismal film!

Sunday, February 7, 2010

INGLORIOUS BASTERDS

Brad Pitt, Christoph Waltz, Diane Kruger, Eli Roth,
Daniel Bruhl, Melanie Laurent, Michael Fassbender


"Once upon a time in Nazi occupied France ..."

So the thing is people either love Quentin Tarantino's films or they can't stand his filming style. Me I'm indifferent. I know his films are peppered with violence and silly storyline with many side plots all culminating with a twist in the climax. It has quirky characters and an eclectic soundtrack. But I also do know he has to be given credit for making films that no one in his right mind would think of directing. He doesn't care if he offends, if he serves up stereotypes and if the film is full of cliches. He is clearly clever, has a good directing eye and can definitely present a good narrative no matter how silly it may seem.

So his latest war themed caper set in German occupied France had all the right ingredients. It has eccentric characters and a great cast (Brad Pitt, Diane Kruger, Daniel Bruhl) to portray them. Kudos to Christoph Waltz! He was brilliant! His character was a delight to watch. The dialogue is funny, witty and vulgar. The languages used were French, German and of course English. Naturally there were English subtitles for the foreign languages. It was quite realistic to watch characters speak in their native tongue. Violent scenes abound (but not that many) with the musical score adding much impact on the flow of events. Some scenes played out like a bad B movie while other sequences were well executed. It includes references to cinematic icons like G.W Pabst and Leni Rienfenstahl who are some of Tarantino's theatrical influences in film making.

For better or worse this are Tarantino times. Whether you like his style or not, I'd simply say watch "Inglorious Basterds" then form your own conclusion. Me? I found it highly entertaining in a nonsensical sort of way.

Blog Purpose

I love to watch movies. There are various reasons why I choose to see a film. It can be an escape from the drudgery of life or to be entertained. It can also give a spectrum into the lives of people across the globe. The art of cinema encompasses a wide scope of genre.
I also love to blog about a vast number of topics and everything else in between. That's why I decided to start this blog. I wanted to document the films I've watched. Either on the big screen or the boob tube. From old time favorites to the latest blockbusters in different formats. They all feed my cinematic experience.
It is basically a personal blog with movie reviews where comments are appreciated. This web article presents some informative tips on how to make our blogs more 'readable'. It is well written and offers some details which can be quite helpful. Although I still believe in the blogging adage ... content is king! So I like to keep it simple and express my opinions direct to the point.

Friday, February 5, 2010

THE HURT LOCKER

Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty,
Guy Pearce, David Morse, Ralph Fiennes


"You'll know when you're in it"

There are war movies that are filled with explosive actions, brutal killings and float by on the we.hate.each.other.thus.we.kill.each.other theory.

Then there are war movies like "The Hurt Locker" that simply narrate and present war in its ugliest form and do so by being direct to the point. It is a raw look at the lives of an elite bomb disposal unit assigned in Baghdad, Iraq. A battlefield teeming with explosives and where your instinct tells you not to trust anyone or anything that moves in that chaotic country. They have only 38 days left in their tour of Iraq, but with each new mission comes another deadly encounter and it is only a matter of time before disaster will strike.

The film is a great character study of 3 different army personalities. You have Staff Sgt William James (Jeremy Renner) born with a fatalistic attitude. He likes to take risks and is reckless yet he's an expert in defusing bombs. Sgt JT Sanborn (Anthony Mackie) approaches everything in his duty and his life in general with extreme caution bordering on the it is better to be safe than sorry attitude. And finally, Specialist Owen Eldridge (Brian Geraghty), a young kid who is haunted by nightmares of dying in the streets of Baghdad. As the fiery chaos of Baghdad swirls around them, the men struggle to understand and contain their new leader long enough for them to make it home.

The 3 main leads are not known actors yet they deliver their roles with a punch. Their contrasting roles are well developed characters. Cameo role appearance by Guy Pearce, Ralph Fiennes and David Morse add some star quality to the film. Although it is not really necessary as the well written script and neat direction (Kathryn Bigelow) more than make up for a tension filled narrative of a day in the life of an elite bomb disposal unit.

There were scenes where I literally held my breath due to the powerfully gripping storyline. Wow. This must see film really blew me away (pun intended!)

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

DEATH DEFYING ACTS

Guy Pearce, Catherine Zeta Jones, Timothy Spall, Saoirse Ronan


"There is no escape"


Star Movies

While channel hopping this afternoon, I caught this film on Star Movies about the magician/illusionist Harry Houdini (Guy Pearce) and his romantic involvement with Mary McGarvie (Catherine Zeta Jones) a con woman posing as a psychic.

The film is set in the 1920s during Harry Houdini's tour of Britain. The famous escapologist has announced that he will grant 10,000 US dollars to anyone who can tell the public the last words uttered by his mother before she died. A Scottish psychic and her daughter Benji (Saoirse Ronan) attempts to con Houdini during a seance to contact his dead mother. However all does not go to plan as the two of them end up falling in love with each other.

Although the film is highly fictional, the actors still manage to portray their characters as humane and believable as possible. Complete with a very distracting Scottish accent, Catherine Zeta Jones as Mary McGarvie is a sympathetic character. Her intentions are good (to provide a better life for her daughter) even though she tricks people into believing she is indeed a psychic who can communicate with the far beyond. Saoirse Ronan who was very creepy as the young Briony in "Atonement" gives another solid performance by totally immersing in her role as the daughter/side kick/apprentice of Mary. As expected, Guy Pearce as Harry Houdini is subtle in his portrayal of the flamboyant illusionist. He provided some insights on a complex character. Houdini was a celebrity who was used to the theatrics of showbiz. As well as a media darling who was deeply troubled by his mother's death.

I'm not really sure what to make of this film. It seemed like it took liberties in narrating a chapter (which never happened) in the colorful life of a real person. A celebrity who was quite beloved in his heydays. Then it forcibly turns into a love story between its main characters. It also tried to draw interest into the world of fake spiritualists who feasted on the impressionable minds of people during that era where amusement and entertainment lacked depth. Yet it somehow works but mostly due to the solid acting of its cast!

Articles

Nowadays, we are more conscious of our dietary needs and our physical well being in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle. There are various websites and articles easily available through the Internet which provide us valuable information about nutrition and proper diet regimens. The first step is to make sure we buy the right sort of food at the supermarkets. I found this comprehensive article which can serve as a guide. Of course, the trick is to eat everything in moderation.

And if all else fails plus you got some extra money to spare, you can always opt for cosmetic surgery to uplift your spirits! Heh

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

THE HANGOVER

Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis, Justin Bartha,
Heather Graham, Mike Tyson, Mike Epps


"Some guys just can't handle Vegas"

The saying goes "What happens in Vegas ... stays in Vegas" well unless you totally forget what really happened in Vegas! This raunchy yet engaging comedy narrates the adventures of Stu, Phil, Alan and Doug. They are in the Sin City to throw Doug a bachelor party. The next morning, they wake up in a messy hotel suite with throbbing hangovers but the worst part is they seem to have 'lost' the groom. The entire film concentrates on the 3 guys trying desperately to retrace their drunken stupor steps and to find Doug just in time for his wedding.

Mostly the film is entertaining due to the fact both the audience and the characters are totally clueless to what really occurred the previous night. There are some funny moments where I laughed out loud. But at the same time, I found some of the situational comedy sequences a bit offensive. But thankfully there were no silly slapstick nor toilet humor added in just to draw some or several laughs.

The characters are well developed and they gel well together as an ensemble despite having contrasting personalities. Their camaraderie and rapport was palpable and it worked towards making the film an amusing puzzle piece romp. I am only familiar with Bradley Cooper (I adore him!) and Justin Bartha because I don't watch "The Office" where Ed Helms is part of the cast. Mike Tyson who was portraying himself in a cameo role was surprisingly funny. The best part in my opinion is the closing credits where 'evidence' of their wild rambunctious partying is shown. So be sure to watch till the very end.

In conclusion, I'd say "The Hangover" was a pleasurable viewing experience. I like the way the story was presented - we get to connect the puzzle pieces together - instead of being spoon fed the correct 'answers' to the "Where is Doug?" conundrum!